<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>McBlogger: low-calorie but still full-flavor</title>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/</link>
<description>

</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:15:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Back on the Block</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Embedded players are for shit...<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/24664786#24664786">Watch the funny here</a>.</em><br />
 <br />
 Yep, The New Kids On The Block are not quite so new.  In fact, viewing this appearance both saddened and amused me.  I must admit that I have never been a fan.  I guess I blame them for the rash of painted denim that plagued my junior high during their heyday.  I had a friend whose mother painted the New Kids on the backs of denim jackets in all their sparkling bedazzled glory.  Sound garish and gaudy?  You bet!  But they did go perfectly with those huge hoop earrings from Claire's.  I can remember being trapped in her blue minivan on a long car ride forced to listen to 'Hangin Tough' in it's entirety.  I tried to count all of the times they said girl, but lost count at 96.  Anyway, cheers to the Kids, and best wishes picking the carcass of boy band fame clean.  Especially Donnie.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/back_on_the_blo.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/back_on_the_blo.html</guid>
<category>yes, it made me laugh</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:15:14 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Barney Frank doesn&apos;t suck</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/13/washington/13barney.html?th=&emc=th&pagewanted=print">Barney Frank has been earning some high praise from some of the asshats</a> in the White House who call him (no joke) 'SCARY SMART'. </p>

<p>Uhm. Fellas. It's not that he's all THAT smart, it's that you're really ALL THAT DUMB.</p>

<blockquote><div>A veteran of parliamentary battles, Mr. Frank is a master of procedural weaponry. When a tactic by Republicans backfired and stripped out provisions that they had wanted, Mr. Frank initially refused to let them fix it.

<p>“If you want to look at this as one big circus, today is the day that the gentleman from Alabama gets to clean up after the elephants,” he said, referring to Representative Spencer Bachus, the ranking Republican on his committee. “And I mean elephants.”</p>

<p>During debate on the bill, a measure to provide debt relief to impoverished countries, he won praise from Republicans.</p>

<p>“Barney has been very fair,” said Representative Dana Rohrabacher of California and one of the most conservative members of the House. “I think that I have been treated more fairly, and a number of my Republican colleagues have been treated more fairly, since the Democrats have become the majority than I was treated by my own leadership.”</p>

<p>Mr. Frank politely interjected, “I know the gentleman joins me in looking forward to continued years of such treatment.” </div></blockquote></p>

<p>Then there's this...</p>

<blockquote><div>Other times, though, Mr. Frank’s impatience and sharp tongue take over.

<p>When Representative Shelley Moore Capito, Republican of West Virginia, criticized a component of the housing bill that would give money to local governments to buy and repair foreclosed properties, saying it would not protect homeowners from foreclosure, Mr. Frank fired back that preventing foreclosures was the goal of a different bill.</p>

<p>“The notion that this bill doesn’t keep people out of foreclosure is true,” he said. “It doesn’t combat global warming. It doesn’t get troops out of Iraq. It won’t help me lose weight. There are a lot of things this bill won’t do that I very much want to do. None of them are a reason to vote against a bill that doesn’t do what it doesn’t say it’s going to do but does what it does. What it does is go to the aid of cities that have been victimized.” </div></blockquote></p>

<p>While I'm still pissed about some of his dumbass attempts to drop mortgage brokers in the grease, I am impressed that he's at least trying to make something happen. It's a far cry from the underwhelming attempts by the White House to alleviate the problems we face as a nation.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/barney_frank_do.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/barney_frank_do.html</guid>
<category>Stupid Republican Tricks</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:05:51 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yay Tim Mahoney!</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed that <a href="http://www.burntorangereport.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5800">Tim has secured his place on the ACC board</a>. Congratulations, Tim!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/yay_tim_mahoney.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/yay_tim_mahoney.html</guid>
<category>Austin</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:43:48 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bless Junior John&apos;s Heart!</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Poor, stupid, pathetic idiot...</p>

<p><li>Cornyn's staff has been busy. First, there was this email</p>

<blockquote><div>Recent polls have claimed Senator Cornyn is in a much tighter race than many of you may have thought possible.

<p>We don’t put much validity in either poll, but Democrats certainly are. Liberal bloggers and Democrat partisans alike have pounced on the results, claiming they spell doom for Senator Cornyn this fall.</p>

<p>The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, lead by liberal New York Senator Chuck Schumer, proclaimed in an email that the polls show “John Cornyn in serious trouble…”</p>

<p>Ultra-liberal blogger Daily Kos, who commissioned and paid for the second poll, called the results “nothing short of remarkable,” and claimed they “hint that this may be a top-tier race before long…”</p>

<p>No one can deny that our opponent and his allies are in desperate need of anything to help them raise resources and give national Democrats reason to invest untold millions into the race, and we must stop them.</p>

<p>Please contribute $10, $25 or $50 to help debunk the myths our opponent and his liberal allies are trying to tell about Senator Cornyn.</p>

<p>The facts are clear, the extreme left is energized and unscrupulous, and our opponent is shamelessly aligned with them and will say and do anything it takes to gain much needed relevance and resources.</p>

<p>Your contribution of $10, $25 or $50 will go a long way towards setting the record straight. It will also send a loud and clear message to national Democrats that Texans won’t fall for their dirty tricks, deceit and deviousness.</p>

<p>Please give what you can to make sure we re-elect John Cornyn and ensure our true Texas values are represented in Washington! </div></blockquote></p>

<p>This is funny as hell since Junior John already has a significant funding advantage over Noriega. Even with that money, <a href="http://www.burntorangereport.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5768">we have two solid polls</a> that make it clear this election is about getting rid of old caca. And of course Junior John is scared. Just <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC_9pD_UCIo">watch this video</a> which makes it pretty clear they ARE taking the polls seriously. </li></p>

<p><li>Then there was <a href="http://www.burntorangereport.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5768">CA's Supreme Court saying that bans on gay marriage are unconstitutional</a>. Which prompted Cornyn to go into full tilt pander and start discussing (you knew it was coming) a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.</p>

<blockquote><Div>Thursday's California court ruling striking down that state's ban on gay marriage will spark a fresh push to add a nationwide ban to the U.S. Constitution, Texas Sen. John Cornyn said shortly after the ruling was announced.

<p>"It's certainly surprising. Many of us thought that the efforts to overturn the tradition marriage laws would be confined just to Massachusetts," said Mr. Cornyn, a chief backer of a push to enact a constitutional ban, which failed in 2004.</p>

<p>The California Supreme Court issued a 4-3 ruling Thursday that overturned a voter-approved ban on gay marriage, finding that domestic partnerships laws are an inadequate substitute for allowing same-sex couples to enter into formal marriages.(<a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/051608dnnatcornynreax.10303c43f.html">DMN</a> via <a href="http://www.thetexasblue.com/cornyn-ca-overturning-ban-will-spark-national-push">Texas Blue</a>)</div></blockquote></p>

<p>Here's the thing... I don't think, if the election were held today, that an anti-gay marriage amendment would pass in Texas again. Oh sure, folks in East and West Texas are just as homophobic as they always were (don't get mad at them, they don't <em>know</em> gay people and it's all strange and foreign to them). The difference is, THEY'RE ALL SICK OF PANDERING AND NONSENSE ISSUES. With gas near $4.00 a gallon, people know there are more important things to worry about. They also know that they can't afford six more years of <a href="http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/02/cornyn_fights_b.html">fancy John Cornyn</a> taking care of himself while he lets important business slide by.</li></p>

<p>Hava Goodun! Junior John sure as hell won't!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/bless_junior_jo.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/bless_junior_jo.html</guid>
<category>Austin</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:29:51 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>No, really, that&apos;ll be enough from the corpulent member from Houston</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In a striking example of douchebagery, Rep. Culberson of Texas decided to speak out on all the horrible earmarks and pork barrel spending in the defense bill. He had his talking points down and was laying them out in his own irritating way. His plan was flawless, save for one critical problem. <br />
<br><br />
<font size ="4">THERE WASN'T ANY PORK IN THE BILL</font><br />
<br><br />
Still, that alone would not have derailed him. What ended up causing his embarrassment was a Democrat who'd had enough. Take a bow, Rep. Obey! You've earned it. <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/15/154617/751/268/516386">Kos has the transcript and the footage</a>. </p>

<p>And make sure, if you have some time, to drop a few dollars to <a href="http://www.skellyforcongress.com/home/">Michael Skelly</a> who's running to rid the Texas delegation of this embarrassment. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/no_really_thatl.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/no_really_thatl.html</guid>
<category>Stupid Republican Tricks</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:44:32 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Are you serious...</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>When will these people <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/05/15/internet.suicide/index.html">STOP</a>?</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/are_you_serious.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/are_you_serious.html</guid>
<category>Shit I don&apos;t want to deal with</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:50:04 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Other uses for empty downtown condos</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://s22.photobucket.com/albums/b314/tmcatee/?action=view&current=BuildingBoard.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b314/tmcatee/BuildingBoard.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a></p>

<p>Yes, we've been wondering what would become of those <s>foreclosures</s> condos downtown. It's good to know that some of the developers are making good use of their buildings. In an effort to keep floating their financing. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/other_uses_for.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/other_uses_for.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:39:35 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Does it still smell like cowshit in Amarillo?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>If not, <a href="http://jobsanger.blogspot.com/2008/05/amarillo-says-no-to-smoking-ordinance.html">I'm totally thinking of moving there</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/does_it_still_s.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/does_it_still_s.html</guid>
<category>Texas</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:43:37 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Things you may have missed...</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><li>You know all that 'news' in the 'media' about people starving in exotic vacay destinations like Honduras? Turns out, the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20670001&refer=latin_america&sid=ahjXx.6rVXXk">World Bank was largely responsible</a>. Well, the World Bank with a heaping helping of <a href="http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/03/the_shock_doctr.html">Friedmanite ideology</a>. Please note, this story comes from Bloomberg... hardly a bastion of liberal thought. </li></p>

<p><li><a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5759857.html">Texas has a surplus! </a>Yay! Can we now, you know, BUILD THE ROADS THAT TXDOT SAID WE CAN'T AFFORD? And maybe fund CHIP? And how about ending tuition deregulation? How about putting money into our underfunded pensions?</p>

<p>According to 39%'s spokespuppy, Leon, there's going to be more 'tax relief' which will end up like 39%'s last tax relief which netted me about 56 cents.</p>

<blockquote><div>"With a surplus of this magnitude, I know the governor believes we need to look at some sort of tax relief, whether it be on property taxes, business taxes or some type of actual rebate, like the federal government can do but we haven't been able to," Black said. </div></blockquote>

<p>ROCK! So, instead of making some good choices that will help us weather the next bad storm (or, in the case of infrastructure, actually help create economic activity and wealth), you're going to treat the surplus as a slush fund. </p>

<p>39%, if you're handing out lulu's, can you please send me a case of Beefeater. I'm trying to perfect the Chelsea Sidecar and need the materials. </li></p>

<p><li>The <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=C5FC9844-3048-5C12-005DA32393C49945">Republicans are trying to fix the NRCC</a>. The good news, at least for us, is that <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/14/usa3">it appears to be working</a>. If you mean 'fix' in the sense of neutering a pet. This should bode well for Skelly, Doherty and even Lampson (can you tell I'm working on that whole 'being derisive toward our candidates' thing?).</li></p>

<p><li>Ladies and gentleman... <a href="http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/stories/05/08/0509cofer_edit.html">Rick Cofer with a rant on plastic bags</a></li></p>

<p>Hava goodun!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/things_you_may_1.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/things_you_may_1.html</guid>
<category>Austin</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:34:38 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A minor request : Part 10089</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Would someone please put <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cocksucker">Adam Sandler</a> and <a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fucktard">Mike Myers</a> out of the universe's misery? Both have summer movies coming out that make it pretty clear that both are fighting one another to become the next Jerry Lewis. Why we'd need another isn't nearly as clear.</p>

<p>So, yeah, if someone would help me out with this it would be great.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/a_minor_prayer.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/a_minor_prayer.html</guid>
<category>Austin</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:07:18 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Defending Obama... Again.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>You know, some of you so busily tracking 'how Obama can definitely win the nomination' and projecting an easy win in November need to understand that victory is far from assured. In fact, if you're telling yourself that 'Hope Changes Everything', then come closer and let me hit you. In the head. </p>

<p>I do that from time to time with stupid people who refuse to realize there's nothing new under the sun. </p>

<p>Many of you are worried about quasi-racist attacks that imply Sen. Obama is some sort of ultra-black nationalist. Or a strident Muslim. Or the love child of Malcolm X and Mary Tyler Moore. Just to alleviate some of your worry and concern, these are stupid things you don't need to worry about. They'll persuade 5% of the electorate and those people weren't going to vote for him anyway.</p>

<p>What you need to watch out for are ginger columnists in swing states like <a href="http://blogs.thestironline.com/?p=16">Will Manly</a>. Will got his panties in a twist over the <a href="http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/04/yes_but_hes_rig.html">small town comment</a> but there's so much more there...</p>

<blockquote><div>I couldn’t vote for you — but not because of your funny name or your lunatic pastor. I couldn’t vote for you because you say we should raise taxes (even on the rich, who I’m convinced already pay too much), and because you say we should abandon Iraq (which I’m convinced would be surrendering a war we must win), and because you don’t respect the Second Amendment (which I’m convinced should disqualify any politician from any office).

<p>Still, I’ve liked your message of unity and your ability to inspire. And, since your rise I’ve hunted, quite frantically, for young conservative leaders with your talent. (To my relief, I found Bobby Jindal.)</div></blockquote></p>

<p>Whoa. Where to begin... First off, Taxes. Will's obvs unaware that the rich pay less than him or me. Wait. What am I thinking? HE'S a newspaper columnist and they don't make shit. Let me rephrase...</p>

<p>THE RICH PAY LESS THAN ME. </p>

<p>On average, the rich pay around 18-20% of their income in taxes. On average, most of us pay 25-30%. Which makes our current tax system regressive, not progressive. However, let's forget all that for a second and just acknowledge one critical reality. We need a massive amount of investment in public infrastructure and services. From public schools to mass transit, we need to set ourselves up for the next 30-50 years of economic growth. That means higher taxes. Why would we want to pay higher taxes? Because that investment in our future makes sure that we're able to enjoy prosperity in 2025. That's what this debate is about... higher taxes and long term prosperity and growth or lower taxes and poverty well into the future. </p>

<p>And don't get me started on higher taxes being necessary just to balance the budget. But then, Will's a Republican so he's not real concerned with balancing the books... why should he be when he can keep running up Daddy's credit card? I love it when 'fiscal conservatives' are more worried about taxes than the deficit. I guess no one ever bothered to explain the linkage between interest rates, federal debt and real disposable income. I should throw the value of the dollar and oil prices in there as well but I don't want to fry little Will's rat brain.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/defending_obama.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/defending_obama.html</guid>
<category>Election 2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:05:56 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>JUST like a football game...</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Making fun of Chris Matthews and Tim Russert is surprisingly easy. However, some manage to screw it up. Much like McBlogger with his Chris Matthews impersonation which is analogous to a bad blow job. You had high hopes at the beginning, maybe you were even anxious with anticipation. But then, well... there were teeth and in the end you find yourself just praying it will be over soon.</p>

<p>What? Too graphic? Sorry about that...</p>

<p>These people have created the <a href="http://kissingsuzykolber.uproxx.com/2008/05/say-isn%E2%80%99t-this-election-just-like-a-great-football-game.html">best satire of MTP and Hardball</a> I've ever seen. Here's an excerpt:</p>

<blockquote><div>Chris: Let’s bring on Tim Russert here. Tim, don’t you think this election is just like a great FOOTBALL GAME?

<p>Tim: You said it. A real barnburner, Chris.</p>

<p>Howard: Jesus.</p>

<p>Tim: You know, it reminds me a lot of when my dad, BIG RUSS, and I watched Bills games together. Just one of those real back-and-forth games. You had Jim Kelly, the great, All-pro quarterback. And you had Thurman Thomas, the wonderful running back. Those were real competitions. And that’s what we have here. A REAL competition. With Barack Obama, whose this sort of great, unpolished talent. Very much like Vince Young, the quarterback down in Tennessee.</p>

<p>Chris: I agree. I think he’s just like Vince Young, right down to the gay throwing motion. This REALLY is astounding. I’ve always said politics is just like football, and it’s showing here.</p>

<p>Tim: Actually Chris, you have deviated from that platform on occasion. I have a quote here that YOU gave to MSNBC just two months earlier where you said, quote: “I think this election is just like a GREAT HEAVYWEIGHT BOXING MATCH,” unquote. So you said boxing match back then, and now you’re saying football. How do you reconcile those two positions?</p>

<p>Chris: HA! That’s amazing, Tim! God, you’re just like a GREAT TENNIS PLAYER! Always volleying back and forth with all kinds of moves. It’s amazing! Let’s bring on Senator Clinton here for a moment. Senator Clinton, don’t you think you’re just like BILL BELICHICK? Always scheming, sort of seeking out that winning edge any way you can find it? In fact, don’t you and your husband combine to represent Belichick perfectly, with your knack for evil plotting and your husband’s penchant for hot cougar tail?</div></blockquote></p>

<p>Seriously, you'll want to read the whole thing.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/just_like_a_foo.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/just_like_a_foo.html</guid>
<category>Election 2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:33:45 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>WTF</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Today I was happily driving along listening intently to what was going on around the world and landed smack dab in the middle of some honest to god bullshit.  (I know this is a surprising occurence in this day and age) Anyway, CNN was chit chatting along about the <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/347046_erbe13.html">country is broke</a>, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/05/10/2240812.htm?section=world">$120 a barrell </a>blah blah blah, the usual....AND THEN...They played clips from and interview they did with a guy leaving a foodbank (in New York I believe).  Anyway, they were discussing how many of the people they are finding at the foodbank these days are far from the "typical" foodbank candidate...  Typical meaning, jobless, carless, uneducated etc.  Well this man happened to have a college education, a home, a car and a job however, he is still unable to make ends meet, something most of us can relate to more often than we would like to admit.  The  story went on to discuss that many Americans right now look comfortable and collected on the surface, they live in nice homes, their kids drive BMW's to school with iPods shoved in their ears but come home to NO FOOD!!!  WTF is that???  I will tell you what it is...RIDICULOUS!!!  Do they truly value the appearance of being "upper crust" above making decisions like saving MONEY and EATING???    I cant imagine being so stupid, not in a million years.  Stories like this are humiliating and disgraceful to our country.  If you act like that, shame on you, starve starve starve away.  Keep your grimy hands off food that people actually need!!!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/wtf_1.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/wtf_1.html</guid>
<category>Stupid Americans!</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:10:31 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What&apos;s wrong with working to 90?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>George Will can't understand why <a href="http://bayareahouston.blogspot.com/2008/04/its-official-george-will-is-idiot.html">some of you people think you should be able to retire</a>. Didn't you know, that's the kind of thing best left to the idle rich? After all, you'd probably just putter around the house. Or play with your grandkids. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/whats_wrong_wit_1.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/whats_wrong_wit_1.html</guid>
<category>Media Madness</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:50:04 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>It makes us sad when you don&apos;t listen to us</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>We do all this work maintaining this blog and in the end, rather than <a href="http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/we_tell_you_how.html">vote the way we tell you to vote</a>, you go off and decide to <a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/05/11/0511austincouncil.html">vote for other people</a>.</p>

<p>It makes us really sad. If this were a Lifetime movie, we'd probably already have punched you out and broken your jaw. By now, no doubt, you'd be in the hospital and we'd be promising you that 'things will be different this time if you'll just stop making us so crazy'. Oh, and you should tell the police you fell down the stairs that don't exist in our house.</p>

<p>But, alas, this isn't a Lifetime movie (you may have noticed the conspicuous absence of Meredith Baxter Birney. That's one HUGE diff between us and Lifetime). It's real life and y'all were VERY disappointing yesterday.</p>

<p>Well, not really.</p>

<p><strong>Place 1</strong> - Hello, Lee. We're honestly happy you're back. We supported Demling because we wanted some new blood. And the guy is, if scruffy, quite bright. At the very least, we're thrilled that Douchie McDouche will not be in a runoff with you. Yeah. The staff here is actually split over whether they hate Brewster or Meeker more.</p>

<p>One last thing... you for mayor. That's a mistake. You looked miserable this time. Serve out the term and enjoy life. </p>

<p><strong>Place 3</strong> - Howdy, Randi! We still don't completely trust you, but the children have completely disregarded our advice and decided that you'll be best in place 3. Now that you're in, you're going to have to make some of those hard choices about tolls that you avoided talking about during the election. Here's some advice...</p>

<p>1) Don't listen to TXDOT - ask Kirk Watson about this one.<br />
2) Get the fuck outta Clarksville and go drive around town at rush hour. It'll give you an idea where the real jamups are... and how to fix them.<br />
3) There are many (Mike Dahmus) who will offer bad advice. Don't listen to them (Mike Dahmus).</p>

<p><strong>Place 4</strong> - We didn't endorse either of the runoff people. We're going with Laura. More on this later.</p>

<p><strong>ACC </strong>- Tim Mahoney. WTF? You people even managed to fuck that up. Now you just have to go back and do it all over again.</p>

<p>Needless to say, we're disappointed. We still love you, but we're disappointed. Don't worry, we'll be over it this afternoon. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/it_makes_us_sad.html</link>
<guid>http://www.mcblogger.com/archives/2008/05/it_makes_us_sad.html</guid>
<category>Austin</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 09:45:45 -0600</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>