April 22, 2009
How YOU should vote : Seriously, no comments so far?
Well, either you've all decided to vote as instructed or you're so incensed that you simply can't bring yourselves to type your insipid little thoughts into a comment box without smashing the keyboard.
So which is it?
Posted by mcblogger at April 22, 2009 08:48 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mcblogger.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/4437
Comments
Confused by this comment:
"Finally, we'd like to mention that, while we're not all that much for single member districts, we do think council should be expanded by 2-3 spots. We also think the gentleman's agreement is a load of shit that's outlived it's usefulness and is, in fact, pretty stupid."
Are you saying you might consider supporting a mixed district plan drawn using 2010 census date? Even Cole at the APC endorsement meeting said she would consider supporting a mixed district plan with 12 to 14 council members after 2010. Meanwhile McCracken, the candidate of change and vision, continues to support keeping the current At-Large election system. That makes him is last council member supporting this past dated postion.
Posted by: McIndependant ![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.mcblogger.com/nav-commenters.gif)
at April 22, 2009 10:55 PM
Either that or SMD (we're kinda split on that).
Posted by: mcblogger at April 23, 2009 11:35 AM
I been for either 8-1 or 10-1 pure SMD plans in the past. At this point, a mixed district plan appears to be the path of least resistance.
Posted by: McIndependant at April 24, 2009 07:25 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
