April 22, 2009

How YOU should vote : Seriously, no comments so far?

Well, either you've all decided to vote as instructed or you're so incensed that you simply can't bring yourselves to type your insipid little thoughts into a comment box without smashing the keyboard.

So which is it?

Posted by mcblogger at April 22, 2009 08:48 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mcblogger.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/4437

Comments

Confused by this comment:

"Finally, we'd like to mention that, while we're not all that much for single member districts, we do think council should be expanded by 2-3 spots. We also think the gentleman's agreement is a load of shit that's outlived it's usefulness and is, in fact, pretty stupid."

Are you saying you might consider supporting a mixed district plan drawn using 2010 census date? Even Cole at the APC endorsement meeting said she would consider supporting a mixed district plan with 12 to 14 council members after 2010. Meanwhile McCracken, the candidate of change and vision, continues to support keeping the current At-Large election system. That makes him is last council member supporting this past dated postion.

Posted by: McIndependant [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 22, 2009 10:55 PM

Either that or SMD (we're kinda split on that).

Posted by: mcblogger [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 23, 2009 11:35 AM

I been for either 8-1 or 10-1 pure SMD plans in the past. At this point, a mixed district plan appears to be the path of least resistance.

Posted by: McIndependant [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 24, 2009 07:25 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?