June 04, 2008
TXDOT, Tolls and riding off into the Sunset
Some interesting things floating 'round the sphere...
"While I am looking forward to addressing this issue [transportation] when the Legislature meets in 2009, " Perry said, "the state cannot afford to repeat 2007. Members of the Legislature must understand that 'no' is not a solution to this challenge. It is an abdication of responsibility." Perry made clear his determination to defend the renting of state right-of-way to private companies in exchange for a fee and building and operating a toll road.
Actually, you ridiculous twerp, selling off your roads IS AN ABDICATION OF RESPONSIBILITY. Not only that, but you and your appointees are so incompetent or corrupt that you didn't even get us a good price. Probably because you're, again, either too incompetent or corrupt to calculate the present value of a revenue stream over time.
This preceded their new Statement on Toll Projects which I'll take a moment to summarize and explain.
1) Not selling the tolls roads... This is pretty dumb since a 50 or more year lease is widely considered a functional sale. In my industry, we call it a leasehold.
2) No roads will be owned by foreign entities. No, but the leases will be held by them.
3) We'll have a way to buy back the roads. Sure, but at what price? I don't expect the crack team at TXDOT to do a good job negotiating this. They're completely out of their element, just as former Commissioner Williamson clearly was.
4) Tolls will be initially set by TXDOT, with formulas and government input for increases. Input isn't control. Nice try, Deidre, but only an idiot would fall for that turn of phrase.
5) No restrictions or non-competes? I'll believe it when I see it, Deidre.
6) Freeways not converted... but if we shrink down the freeway lanes to add a lane, we'll call that added capacity and we'll toll it
This, my friends, is the translation. If you're dumb enough to fall for ANYTHING from this Commission, then you really don't deserve any spot at the table.
All in all, this pretty solidly leaves corporate welfare proponents in the drivers seat and continues to ignore the most cost effective solution, which Burka NAILED.
At the end of the day, this is so transparently a 'Let's give a perpetual revenue stream to a campaign contributor (ZACHRY)' that it surprises me so many 'fiscal conservatives' are in favor of it. Wonder if they're getting paid by Zachry as well. I already know 39% is.
Hava goodun!
Posted by mcblogger at June 4, 2008 10:04 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mcblogger.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/3430
Comments
I don't see how an elected TTC would work unless the Lege gave them authority over the gas tax or other financing means. Since most of our problems seem to be based on the fact that voters pick the wrong leaders (Perry, Craddick and minions, the entire Supreme Court and RRC), it's hard to imagine that simply making TxDOT subject to direct electoral oversight would improve the situation. I do like the recommendations the SSC made that strengthen the oversight powers of the Lege: forcing Perry to submit commissioners for approval or else he loses the privilege of appointment.
What we need is a Lege that is functional and not afraid to raise money when appropriate through the most efficient means, in this case taxation (I'll leave the banal discussions of the differences in labeling of tax vs. fee to the Burkas of the world).
Posted by: Kedron Touvell
at June 4, 2008 02:45 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

